[Shr-User] What's going on (3)

[Sebastian Spaeth]

Helge Hafting wrote:
>>>> The last thing we are grappling with before
>>>> we can push out: JaMa wanted to fix version numbering so we can offer
>>>> opkg upgrades rather than requiring reflashes (too often) in the
[...]
>> No, you will have to reflash this time for sure. Too much has changed
>> and we simply don't have the resources in our unstable branch to
>> test/implement all upgrade paths.
> 
> This time, sure. But no more after that, is my understanding?

No, I was not saying that we will never have to reflash again. :-)
But JaMas changes will make the version numbering more consistent, so
opkg recognizes updates properly as such.

But it might well be that we'll have to reflash once we merge our shr
-specific stuff into the upstream OE tree. Believe us, we don't like
reflashing either....

We will try very hard to avoid reflashing in the more stable trees (once
those exist :-) )

spaetz


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.shr-project.org/pipermail/shr-user/attachments/20091118/5e7971d5/attachment.pgp 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.shr-project.org/pipermail/shr-user/attachments/20091118/5e7971d5/attachment-0001.pgp