[Shr-User] SHR-U: Very short timout times, again.
Tim Abell
tim at timwise.co.uk
Sat Apr 17 00:46:33 CEST 2010
while i remember, the placement / alignment of the labels is also very
confusing.
it is currently:
lock
2 sec
idle
30 sec
etc.
this means they lead the eye to think they are paired up wrong.
it would be easier if the labels were more like:
lock
2 sec
idle
30 sec
ideally with a line separating each row
thx
Tim Abell
Tim Abell wrote:
> I make that as follows (after a little experimentation on shr-t a few
> days back):
>
> Listed in order that the events occur, with my personal preference for
> timings
>
> 1. idle (30 secs) - the important one, how long before
> initial semi-dim
> 2. idle dim (1 sec) - slightly darker dim
> 3. idle prelock (1 sec) - display blanked
> 4. lock (0 sec) - locked (i think this should be immediate
> that the display is blanked to prevent accidental actions)
> 5. suspend (60 sec) - one minute further before suspending so
> that if I just missed it i don't have to hit the screen and then go
> "huh?" before remembering to hit the power button.
>
> hope that helps
>
> Tim Abell
>
More information about the Shr-User
mailing list